The Berkeley review education is calling for seniors, scholars, those who make policies and practitioners to surrender articles that focus on educational diversity. The board is highly welcoming editorials that touch especially on our main concerns, which are:

1. Vital scholarship

The Berkeley review submission calls for papers that talk about critical scholarships-especially those that do critical analysis, assessments, and the problems brought by the power structure, and also help in imagining innovations.

2. Building communities

Berkeley review education seeks to ensure a new and existing cordial relationship with the community surrounding us. It enables us to have a peaceful coexistence with non-academy. Since it is a journal that everybody can access, our purpose is to democratize and inspire work and communicate to a bigger audience such as scholars, practitioners, etc.

3. Issues that are pressing

The Berkeley review education also seeks editorials that focus on emerging issues regarding the education system, the environment where learning takes place, etc.

Berkeley reviews submissions guidelines

In need of guideline on how to apply for peer review board UC Berkeley? The authors who will submit the Berkeley review articles are assured of their copyrights. Also, Berkeley Review education does not accept published work that has been done previously, or that has been submitted somewhere. The Berkeley Review Education policies prohibit the submission of already published work.

Those eligible should submit articles that focus on historical analysis, literary essays, and many others. Writers are discouraged from mentioning the authors and institutions while doing the Berkeley review.

The criteria to use when writing the manuscript

The manuscript that will be published will be reviewed based on the relevance to the subject, theoretical framework, the procedure used, suitability of the questions, the consistency of the methods, data collection techniques and analysis, conclusions of the research, general contribution, and clarity.

• Required format

Berkeley review submission requires electronic Microsoft word submissions. It is the acceptable mode of submission. All the text, including headings, title, citation, references tables, should be well-typed and ensure the spacing is double with 1″ all around. All files with twelfth font should be submitted as a single file with a summary with not more than five keywords.

• The length of the Berkeley review submissions

The required pages are limited to thirty but not inclusive of references and citations. If you exceed this, your work will not be published. Tables and figures should have placed at the end of the review, and the authors should make it to the minimum.

• Writing style

All the authors should number indicate the page numbers of their texts. They should also adhere to the writing style of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (6th edition, 2009) to make all the reviews to be uniform.

• Editing process

The Berkeley review will undergo two types of editing. The substantive one involves major changes, and the minor one involves correcting minor errors. After this, copyediting is then done on the last confirmation of the manuscripts. The time we will accept the Berkeley review submissions will be six months, and after that, the publication is now done.

Conclusion

If you need to make publication on the Berkeley review, read through the guidelines on their website and follow their instructions. The UC Berkeley call for papers has a period for accepting publications.

Accepting a request to be a reviewer

When an editor invites you to peer-review a research paper, you should look and consider if your area of expertise matches what the editor is expecting.

Are you biased or not? Editors do not like to be involved in conflicts though hiring editors who have some relationship with any author. Editors will require a reviewer who will review the work stating the facts and not being influenced by personal relationships.

Also, when writing a review, you should have time management skills because journals require you to write new reviews consistently.

Do you have time to conduct the peer reviewing a research paper, as it always takes too long to conduct one review? Ask yourself whether you will be able to submit your work within the stipulated time?

Writing a peer review paper

Once you meet the editor’s expectations and you have now accepted to write peer reviewing paper, use the methods described below to produce a quality peer reviewing a paper to ensure that there is maximum performance.

1. Go through the entire paper to see whether it is principally publishable

This is one of the importance of peer review in writing. Going through the work will give a sense of the author’s approach and what questions the author focuses on. Reading through the work will enable all the materials that the author has used to create a story. The beginning paragraph should focus on the question that the author is addressing. Also, ensure that you include the summary of goals you want to achieve, the approach you will use, and the conclusions of writing a peer review paper. It indicates to your editor that you know what the paper talks about and read it thoroughly. The second paragraph should focus on a conceptual overview of what the paper contributes.

2. Study the paper for the second time and write the main points while writing a peer review paper

After identifying that the main thoughts of the paper can be published, draft the main points of the paper, not forgetting to check on both the negative and positive sides. Ensure your points are well organized in separate paragraphs, and they should be written logically to stand out clearly.

3. Read the paper again as you look o how its structure and finalize it

Peer reviewing a research paper entails looking at issues such as the language used, headings and subheadings, grammar, and even the structure of your review. Assess whether the review flows chronologically and identify errors that may be there.

After completing the review

after achieving it, wait for your editor’s feedback on whether the review has been accepted or rejected. If it is accepted, you should not disclose the contents of the review until it is obliged.

One word to teachers and instructors

A guide to peer-reviewing is still not clear to graduate school. Therefore, there is a need for more tying and mentorship programs to help students perform peer reviewing a paper easily. the best way to achieve this is to work together.

Conclusion

The importance of peer review in writing equips you with some skills such as time management and discipline. Therefore, there is a need for graduate schools to offer training and mentorship for students. Also, when editors invite you to a review, ensure you are not biased and manage time well.